Skip to main content

Principles of Evolution - Natural Selection

Let's now talk about the processes by which evolution works. This is fairly obvious stuff, but bear with me as I point out areas for improvement, expansion, and reference to humans. The first and foremost principle of evolution which made Darwin well-known is Natural Selection. Again, this links back to a previous principle, that of "all life that cannot exist does not", so many of the principles flow into one another. An important note to make about natural selection is that it is a retroactive process, which means that it works backwards. It does not predict the future, or selection pressures, but instead it acts as a sweeper of life that is no longer self-supporting when faced with a new reflection of its environment. For example, the reflection of a sudden and prolonged lack of food for say, dinosaurs, is put simply a dinosaur without food, and this is a non-supporting life form. Therefore, it becomes extinct.

The principle of Natural Selection states that all living organisms must be adapted to their environment, be it a natural environment such as a lake that has taken a thousand years to form, or an artificial environment such as an incubator for premature babies. Of course, the incubator is adapted to the baby more than the baby is adapted to the incubator, so adaptation works both ways, especially in the case of humans who are able to manipulate their environment to a greater extent than wolves or lillies. But let's save the topic of human evolution for later, and focus firstly on natural environments, because it is those which result in the evolution of life capable of manipulating its environment to a great degree, such as humans.

Natural environments are defined as environments which cause life forms to exist, rather than be caused by life forms themselves. For example, a classroom cannot be defined as a natural environment because it has been made by humans. However, a desert is a natural environment for snakes. The key characteristics of natural environments which take part in evolution are called selection pressures. Selection pressures are the changing properties of an environment which cause life forms to have to respond. These, too, are natural or artificial. As a human, you will be more aware of the artificial selection pressures than of the natural ones. For example, you might be less worried about a storm than your debt. However, in natural environments the selection pressures are natural too, if they are a cause of the environment itself.

Natural selection pressures such as increasing temperature or floods, can impact on living organisms so that most are unable to survive. This automatically removes those organisms' genes from the gene pool by their death, so that "naturally", only the few that happened to have a mutation which favoured their survival are left over. They multiply, so that their advantageous mutations are passed on, and future generations are resistant to the change that happened in the past, that is the increase in temperature or flooding. This doesn't stop here, because selection pressures change - although at different rates in different environments at diferent times. For example, sharks are thought to be the best adapted species on Earth, and they have been around for millions of years. So even though their environment may have many changing properties, these are not selection pressures, because the sharks are already well-adapted to most environmental changes.

On the other hand, there are species which experience changing adaptations frequently, due to their ever-changing environment. For example, certain species of insect have been discovered to have had wings 10 million years ago, lost them 5 million years ago, and now have their wings back again. They have always had the gene responsible for wing development, but this gene was turned off 5 million years ago as a result of their environment and its selection pressures at that time. If some insects happened to have had no wings, and the selection pressure involved predating birds eating them during flight, then those with no wings would have survived and passed on their turned off wing-gene.

Natural Selection is a retroactive process, as we have seen, which involves the death of ill-adapted life, and the propagation of the leftover life which has survived the selection pressures. What about foreseeing of selection presures, and planning ahead? Is there such principle of evolution?

Yes, there is. Let's now move on to the proactive selection process, Sexual Selection in the following Post.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

By-products of Evolution - why not everything has a purpose

Last time we looked at how certain major adaptations such as hair loss have enabled humans to survive over the millennia in different conditions, and when faced with competition from other species. Not everything about the human body has a specific purpose, though, in the sense that we expect it to. One example of such thing is the philtrum - that little channel leading from the base of your nose to the upper lip. Recent research suggests that this development dates back millions of years, and has been inherited from fish. Apparently, when human embryos develop their face in the womb, all parts of the forehead, mouth, etc come together and fuse where the philtrum is located.


Some adaptations, on the other hand, are no longer relevant not because of their nature, but because the environmental selection pressure for which they evolved has disappeared. For example, an East Asian's typical eyelid shape evolved as a result of higher light intensities in that area of the world, yet the …

The evolution of the human body

In order to be able to look at ourselves in the mirror and be able to answer the question "Why do I look like this?", we must look back to our ancestry and their lifestyle, over a very long period of time. For the purpose of this analysis, let's look at the human versus the neanderthal. Recently there have been found neanderthal genes within the human gene pool, but the two species are different enough to compare, yet not too different (human versus fly would be too different).

As you can see, the construction of the human pelvis and toes is different, and the human has less hair. This results in humans being able to run easily for long distances, in the detriment of short-distance running which we are worse at. We sweat better, so we can do more long-term effort. This feat is essential to better settlements, as we can discover a larger area with potentially better resources. It might seem counterproductive to not be able to run quickly for a short period, when it comes …

4 Reasons Google's Calico Won't "Solve Death"

The on-line world has been taken ablaze by Calico's bid to end ageing, and thus death itself, but is this what they will actually focus on, and will they achieve it?



The fact is ageing will be reversed, and death by "natural causes" will go with it. The questions are "When?" and "By whom?".

Until recently, not a lot was known about the approach Calico would take in this venture dubbed "moonshot thinking" - a term touted by Google as the source of all considerable human progress throughout history. This we don't doubt, but is this what Calico is all about?


CNN's Dan Primack has revealed details about Calico's plan, which hint at a less-than-moonshot thinking approach, and cast a serious question mark on its ability to deliver the punchy TIME headline. Here is why:

1. The man with the idea, Bill Maris, arrived at the conclusion that the root of all death-causing disease is simply ageing itself. Not only is this widely known in the ant…