Skip to main content

What Living in a Computer Might Feel Like

What is the relationship between consciousness and sensory input?

Consider this: you are on a beach sipping a cocktail while the sun sets over the horizon. There is significant information which may be considered fresh, or renewed, which is being drilled into your perception of the surroundings - the breeze, sight, sound, taste, smell, gravity, balance, etc.

The continuous transfer of information into your brain is defining your conscious experience which feels unmistakeably "real".

Now consider the exact same scenario on the beach, but as a dream. Your subjective experience may feel quite identical, as long as you don't spontaneously realise within the dream that it's a dream (lucid dreaming). Even then, the sensations simulated - without a doubt, they are simulated because there is no beach, there is no breeze, etc. - you are after all sedated in your bed with your body under paralysis; those sensations still feel pretty convincing, and only upon waking are they deemed lesser than "reality".

Nonetheless, there must be a clear line dividing the dreaming consciousness and the awake consciousness if lucid dreaming is even possible, which it is.

I suggest that dreaming consciousness is supported by old information potentially being recycled in various ways, rather than intercepted live through sensory pathways. In a scenario where a mind is isolated from sensory input, for example as existing in a computer interface, and presumably pre-packed with information or programmed, the playing out of thoughts may end up feeling more like a dream than reality, due to the lack of live sensory input.

The scenarios played out in the mind soon after fainting also feel like dreams, despite not actually occurring in the same sequence as that leading up to sleeping dreams. It would appear that the backstage processing of information is actually ongoing regardless of an awake or asleep state.

So each night when you go to sleep, ponder for a second the sheer uniqueness of this experience: your body is sedated slowly and consciousness fades, only to resurrect itself back again intermittently in a dream world composed entirely of simulated imagery that nonetheless feels real, or almost real.

Ultimately, only experiencing reality can provide the backdrop to concluding the dream experience is inferior, and who's to say that if we were wandering through dreams for long enough, we wouldn't get a better sense of ourselves and learn to control the situations encountered rather than let them happen to us, much like a toddler explores a brand new world and slowly learns their way around?

And last but not least: if living in a computer that resembled continuous lucid dreaming i.e. being in control of the simulated environment and yourself to the point where you may be able to change anything and everything, essentially doing whatever you want to the full extent of the meaning, were possible for you - would you be tempted?

Comments

  1. Living in the Matrix... it's not supposed to be a choice, since your soul will accept to be such a "slave" only if it has no experience of the "freedom".

    Of course I'll be tempted.

    Gildas.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Comment...

Popular posts from this blog

By-products of Evolution - why not everything has a purpose

Last time we looked at how certain major adaptations such as hair loss have enabled humans to survive over the millennia in different conditions, and when faced with competition from other species. Not everything about the human body has a specific purpose, though, in the sense that we expect it to. One example of such thing is the philtrum - that little channel leading from the base of your nose to the upper lip. Recent research suggests that this development dates back millions of years, and has been inherited from fish. Apparently, when human embryos develop their face in the womb, all parts of the forehead, mouth, etc come together and fuse where the philtrum is located.


Some adaptations, on the other hand, are no longer relevant not because of their nature, but because the environmental selection pressure for which they evolved has disappeared. For example, an East Asian's typical eyelid shape evolved as a result of higher light intensities in that area of the world, yet the …

The evolution of the human body

In order to be able to look at ourselves in the mirror and be able to answer the question "Why do I look like this?", we must look back to our ancestry and their lifestyle, over a very long period of time. For the purpose of this analysis, let's look at the human versus the neanderthal. Recently there have been found neanderthal genes within the human gene pool, but the two species are different enough to compare, yet not too different (human versus fly would be too different).

As you can see, the construction of the human pelvis and toes is different, and the human has less hair. This results in humans being able to run easily for long distances, in the detriment of short-distance running which we are worse at. We sweat better, so we can do more long-term effort. This feat is essential to better settlements, as we can discover a larger area with potentially better resources. It might seem counterproductive to not be able to run quickly for a short period, when it comes …

4 Reasons Google's Calico Won't "Solve Death"

The on-line world has been taken ablaze by Calico's bid to end ageing, and thus death itself, but is this what they will actually focus on, and will they achieve it?



The fact is ageing will be reversed, and death by "natural causes" will go with it. The questions are "When?" and "By whom?".

Until recently, not a lot was known about the approach Calico would take in this venture dubbed "moonshot thinking" - a term touted by Google as the source of all considerable human progress throughout history. This we don't doubt, but is this what Calico is all about?


CNN's Dan Primack has revealed details about Calico's plan, which hint at a less-than-moonshot thinking approach, and cast a serious question mark on its ability to deliver the punchy TIME headline. Here is why:

1. The man with the idea, Bill Maris, arrived at the conclusion that the root of all death-causing disease is simply ageing itself. Not only is this widely known in the ant…