Intuition is the complex, as of yet
unexplained phenomenon which enables people to gain knowledge without any
direct or obvious pathway from raw, disconnected components, to a unified,
coherent idea. The source of intuition is unknown, and therefore knowledge
gathered through it is often questioned for its usefulness, validity and
accuracy.
The
source and process of intuition can be viewed in a mathematical way. I propose a viewpoint, not my own or original,
that takes into account our human perspective and its relationship with the
physical reality truths.
This
can be boiled down to our own nature, and its necessary obedience of any
natural principles or laws. In essence, this means that we
are part of the universe, on the deepest and loosest level of connection,
through the fabrics that span the farthest regions of the world, by the most
fundamental principles such as time or gravity; and more intimately in our
environment, through the fabrics that span closer regions of the world, by more
specific principles such as biochemical processes and brain interpretation of
sensory signals.
We can
therefore access these laws within ourselves, by ourselves, as a function of
our position in the immediate and broader universe we are found in. Not only
are we observers of the environment and all its phenomena, but we are first and
foremost, part of it. From the most basic levels through to the highest, we are
a prime sample, test subject or specimen of the universe itself.
Much of the universe can be considered not to
be accessible to our perception in an obvious way, such as light in our eyes
and matter against the Pacinian corpuscles in our skin. Yes the spectrum of
sensation that is available, the synergy between different senses, as well as
our considerable processing power of all of them through the brain, amounts to
a respectable amount of information.
By a
process of reverse engineering, we can therefore work out the fundamental
truths from the superficial expressions of these truths in ourselves and our
lives. Higher, more virtual interpretations
of these signals may occur mostly or solely within the brain, with minimal
novel sensory input, such as in the case of intuition in matters of social
interaction. Lower, physical interpretations of signals occurring in a more
physical sense, may provide starting points and clues to fundamental laws, such
as gravity, movement, diffusion, etc.
In a first instance, these ideas are purely
experienced, and therefore not laid out systematically in an academic sense.
Whilst the latter process greatly enables the dissemination and progress of
those ideas, it is important to not dismiss the process of gathering these experiences
in itself; for they are the basis of any further knowledge.
"There is no true interpretation of anything; interpretation is avehicle in the service of human comprehension. The value ofinterpretation is in enabling others to fruitfully think about anidea."
- Andreas Buja, Professor of Statistics
This can be achieved to varying degrees,
depending on people's different abilities to reverse engineer these occurrences
back to the fundamental truths. It is therefore expected that any
given knowledge resulting from it may be more or less usable or accurate, since
the processors of intuitive knowledge are people. Like a furniture factory,
each person may well have equally valid raw materials (wood) and aspirations
for the end-point knowledge (furniture), but different ability to accomplish
this determines whether the end product really is of high quality or not.
Comments
Post a Comment
Comment...